Tuesday, November 9, 2010

What Hydrologists are Studying

Last week I attended the annual GSA (Geological Society of America) conference in Denver.  My favorite sessions involved the impact of urbanization on hydrology, and I thought I'd share a few of the things I learned.

It has been noted that humans are important geological agents.  Currently, half of the worlds population lives in cities which require vast amounts of crushed rock, iron, copper, and various other inorganic substances.  My favorite undergrad professor would always say "what can't be grown must be mined."  Humans have leveled mountains for ore, created land by filling marshes, and changed the movement and quality of water on and under the ground surface. 

Urban watersheds are a hot topic of research.  As we build cities, we cover streams and ponds with impervious surfaces.  Stream networks that once had several tens of tributaries have been reduced to a few that can be counted on your fingers because people don't want a stream running through their business or house.  This puts greater strain on the remaining tributaries which can lead to flooding and faster rates of erosion.  To get around this in San Jose, they have concrete-lined many if not all of the streams in the city.  The concrete reduces erosion of the banks, and it creates laminar flow which requires more energy to flood.  While the people and business are mostly safe, the streams are ugly and they reduce the recharge of the groundwater which is an important function of streams.  

As cities grow, we install more underground utilities - conduits for gas and electric lines, water, internet, and subways.  The outside of these tunnels/channels are often filled with gravel.  Gravel drains well and is usually abundant.  Scientists have dubbed this 'urban karst.'  Karst is the geologic phenomena generally responsible for forming caves - such as Mammoth Cave in Kentucky.  One scientists estimated that the percent of channels in Mammoth Cave is approximately equal to the percent of channels under Quebec, Canada.  Considering the shear size of Mammoth Cave, that is astounding.  So, cities have taken away surface water and exchanged it for subsurface water.  As a rule of thumb, scientists estimate water utilities leak at least 6%.  Adding this to our urban karst plus all of the water we use for our lawns, washing our cars, etc - Groundwater recharge under cities is actually increasing.  This can be a good or a bad thing - depending on the quality (i.e. cleanliness) of the recharged water.

Rainwater runoff is a hot topic in the Bay Area because we are trying to protect the bay as a natural area.  It is completely surrounded by cities.  Imagine your daily life - every time you drive, incomplete combustion from your engine releases organic particulates that settle onto the roads.  Furthermore, your tires eventually wear down.  They don't disappear by magic - they leave bits of tire everywhere you've been.  When you brake, bits of your brake pads spew onto the roads.  These little bits add up.  When it rains, water picks up these particulates and carries them 'away'.  Some runoff in the Bay Area is treated because it is mandated.  In other cities, the runoff washes to the side of the road where the particulates percolate down into the soil, streams, and groundwater.  You might think the journey is over - but alas it has only just begun.  One group in Illinois took on an interesting project.  When it snows in the winter, the city sprays salt on the roads to reduce the ice.  This group monitored salt for four years in a nearby marsh.  They compared the marsh water to our drinking water standards, and they found that the salt lasts in the marsh for at least a year in quantities far greater than you and I would drink.  And as last years salt is dwindling, the winter snows return bringing more applied salt.  

But all is not lost.  Scientists and city planners are beginning to think about groundwater flow and it's relationship to natural areas.  A park in Alberta, Canada that is surrounded by a city modeled their subsurface groundwater flow.  The modeling software, a standard for hydrology, is capable of tracking the flow of the water before it gets to the park.  The park was able to determine the source of the groundwater flowing under their park.  Amazingly enough, even though the source of the water was not in the park, city regulators are beginning to discuss ways of protecting the integrity of the water before it reaches the park!  

Another group is studying permeable pavements.  These are quite useful for reducing puddles on the road, and increasing visibility during rain storms.  They are often a 2 inch layer of loosely packed crushed rock and some sort of binding agent to keep the rock together on top of traditional asphalt.  As rain percolates through the 2 inch layer, particulates from our cars are trapped, which greatly improves the quality/cleanliness of the road runoff.  It seems like a miracle fix for non-icy climates, however it has to be replaced every 10 years or so, but it is often recycled and used again in another permeable surface.  There are other kinks to work out, but it seems like people are working to keep our urban water clean.  

I learned quite a lot at the conference, and I really enjoyed the city of Denver.  The week before we were there, it snowed in the Rocky Mountains.  It was a beautiful sight from the city.  Just think, in a few months time, that snow will be someone's drinking water.  As snow melt, it has a long way to travel before it gets to someone's glass.

Monday, November 1, 2010

Your Vote Counts!

Greetings from sunny Denver!  I have successfully completed my first talk at a professional conference.  Unfortunately, preparing for my talk took a giant chunk out of my blogging time.  However, for all the Americans who read my blog, I STRONGLY encourage you to vote tomorrow!

I also encourage you to read about the local candidates, because several of them will directly or indirectly impact your water resources.  For instance, we have elections for water board members this time - they have a direct impact on the water resources, water quality, and environmental impacts of discharge in your area.  City councils and urban planning interact closely, and urban development means a greater population straining water resources, soil erosion and water pollution at construction sites, and other lasting effects of increasing infrastructure (next time I'll blog about the things I learned at the conference concerning cities and their impact on local hydrogeology).

Again, just vote!  It takes a bit of time to become informed, but it's worth it.  Before last year, voting to me was reserved for president.  After I took a bit of time to make informed decisions, I felt a sense of accomplishment and I felt like a worthwhile member of the community.  And if it's any consolation, my Australian readers will tell you they are required by law to vote!  

Sorry I didn't talk about water much, but I thought voting was important.

Happy Voting!

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Down the Drain

My husband and I are almost finished moving.  Moving to a house from an apartment brings several new responsibilities.  The one most often on my mind is our new water bill.  At our apartment, water flowed from the tap and we paid no mind.  Every drop counts now, though we should have paid attention before.  So, how can we conserve around the house?  Many of us have likely heard 'turn off the water when you brush your teeth,' and 'make sure your dishwasher is full before you start a load,' but this isn't enough.  I wanted to take a closer look at where we are using the most water and how much it is costing us.

First, I looked at what my water costs are so I can set our water usage goals.  Mountain View offers three tiers of service, if you use 300 cubic feet or less each month, you pay only $1.65 per hundred cubic feet.  If we go over 300 cubic feet, we will pay a whopping $3.41per hundred cubic feet!  So, my goal is to use less than 300 cubic feet each month.  But, what is a cubic foot?  One hundred cubic feet is 748 gallons.  So, three hundred cubic feet is 2,244 gallons of water.  Our goal: use less than 2,244 gallons of water each month (561 per week).

The Dishwasher
I found an interesting blog post that researched whether hand washing or using a dishwasher was more water and energy efficient (http://1greengeneration.elementsintime.com/?p=314).  Surprisingly, using a dishwasher saved more water, energy, and human time than hand washing.  So, I estimate we will use the dishwasher 3 times each week, and I will wash the dishes by hand 3 times each week.  When I wash dishes by hand, it is usually things that will not fit or should not be washed in the dishwasher.  I feel like I use about 5 gallons each time I do this by hand (I wash in a sink partially filled with soapy water, and rinse directly into the same sink with running water, which helps me estimate my water usage).  So, my water budget starts with 15 gallons of water.

I found the manual for the dishwasher, and it lists the water consumption for each wash cycle:
Pots and Pans: 8.4 gallons
Normal Wash: 6.3 gallons
Light/China:  4.2 gallons
Quick Wash: 3.7 gallons
Rinse and Hold: 2 gallons

I usually use a normal wash, and 3 washes per week equates to 18.9 gallons of water.

My water budget is up to 33.9 gallons per week, only for dishes!  I think I can reduce my usage by using less soap when handwashing because this will require less rinse water.  Also I can use a light or a quick wash, especially when dishes aren't very dirty.

The Washing Machine
Do you ever wonder exactly what "Permanent Press" is?  Apparently, it is a warm wash cycle that adds extra water at the end of the wash cycle to cool the clothes before they are rinsed!  Is that really necessary?  Oregon State University has an interesting article where I found this and other washing machine information (http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/html/em/em8358-e/).
In the past, I have typically washed 3-4 loads each week with cold water.  According to the Oregon State Link, water needs to be above 60 degrees Fahrenheit to properly clean your laundry.  Also, heating water is the largest energy consumer in the house.  Thus, only use warm washes sparingly, or if your water is colder than 60F.  60F water is cool, and would be nice to swim in on a hot summer day.  If you're curious, try using a thermometer on it.  A typical top-loader washer uses 40 to 60 gallons of water on a full load.  I have my washer set to a med-large load, so I will estimate 45 gallons per load which brings my weekly washing total to 135 gallons each week.  Front loaders can use half this amount, so if you can afford a new washer, I would go for it.

There is also a neat cost calculator (http://michaelbluejay.com/electricity/laundry.html) if you're curious about total energy and water consumption.

The Bathroom
Federal Laws require that new shower heads use no more than 2.5 gallons per minute (http://www.energysavers.gov/your_home/water_heating/index.cfm/mytopic=13050).  I don't know exactly how old our shower head is, but it may be a good idea to replace it.  Some suggest you can turn the water off while you use the soap, but I have not mastered this art.  So, assuming Will and I both take 15 minute showers, 7 days a week, at 2.5 gallons per minute, we are at 525 gallons of water!!  That is almost our total for the week!  I think we'll have to try to shorten our showers and turn off the water when we're not using it.

So, my water budgeting was a huge shock, but I think I've found ways to conserve - especially shorter showers, and changes in dishwasher and washing machine settings.  There are always other water uses, it's hard to estimate how much we use each week to cook and drink.  I also garden in the spring and summer which will create another draw on our water usage.  But, I think I'm off to a good start.

I would like to thank my husband for his good ideas, his participation in our household water use reduction, and especially his photography - he took the picture of the water drop on the rose that is behind my blog.  Thanks Will!

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Diving In

Welcome to my first blog!  As many of you know, I am student at SJSU studying hydrogeology in California.  What this really means is I am studying sources and movement of water as surface water (rivers and lakes) and as groundwater.  As the world population continues to grow, so does the strain on our water resources.  Thus, humans and hydrogeology are intertwined.  So, I've made it a goal in my education to focus on water policies in addition to the science behind our water resources.  I am currently taking a water policy class at SJSU, and our main project is to participate!  Lo and behold - a participation blog!

Throughout the next few months, I am aiming to educate myself about water in several ways.  I am initially going to tackle water around the home - my husband and I are moving to a house where we will pay for our own water, unlike the apartment we were in previously.  Here, I will focus on conservation.  I also aim to participate in community-related water issues by volunteering and attending city council meetings.  Finally, with elections quickly approaching, I aim to learn about the current water issues and water district candidates.

My initial goal is to educate myself, but I hope I can educate and inspire others to become more involved in water where they live.  Remember, water doesn't just magically appear at your tap...

 (Whew - first blog down)